"One must seek, on humanity's behalf, medical progress unblocked by pharmaceutical lobbyism that, together with that of arms mongers, is one of the world's most powerful."  - Gilles Vigneault, defending the work of Gaston Naessens and 714-X

TODAY BECKY FINISHES THE STORY OF BILLY BEST, the Massachusetts teen who ran away from home to avoid chemotherapy for Hodgkin's lymphoma.  After only 2-1/2 months of treatment with 714-X, a homeopathic camphor compound, Billy was cancer free and remains so to this day, now 20 years later.

THE STORY OF GASTON NAESSENS, FEATURED IN CANADA'S SATURDAY NIGHT MAGAZINE

BILLY BEST WEBSITE

BOOK - THE BILLY BEST STORY:  BEATING CANCER WITH ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE - by Billy Best as told to Linda Conti

And now, 20 years later:  CONNECTICUT SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS RULING THAT TEEN MUST UNDERGO CHEMO - by the way, and FYI - the SAME diagnosis as Billy Best - Hodgkin's Lymphoma

CHEMOTHERAPY FOR HODGKIN LYMPHOMA - And someone can be FORCED to undergo this?

"Hodgkin lymphoma chemotherapy-related side effects

While chemotherapy destroys rapidly-dividing cancer cells, it can also affect normal cells, such as those in the hair, mouth, GI tract and bone marrow.

Sometimes, chemotherapy temporarily lowers your blood counts, causing:

  • Increased risk of infection (from neutropenia, or low white blood cell count)
  • Fatigue (from anemia, or low red blood cell count)
  • Easy bruising and bleeding (from thrombocytopenia, or low platelet count).

Other side effects of chemotherapy for Hodgkin lymphoma may include:

  • Nausea/vomiting
  • Hair loss
  • Diarrhea
  • Mouth sores
  • Weight loss
  • Depression
  • Fertility problems
  • Shortness of breath
  • Cardiotoxicity (heart damage)"

THE NUREMBERG CODE - Wow.  Look at this, the first condition protecting human rights:

"1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.

This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved, as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that, before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject, there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person, which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.

The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity."

PARENTAL RIGHT TO REFUSE MEDICAL TREATMENT - Thomas H. Roberts & Associates, P.C. - Virginia's Civil Rights & Personal Injury Law Firm

"Nothing could be more harmful to a child than the government ripping that child from his/her parents simply because the government thinks it knows better, labeling a parent as unfit because the parent has the audacity to have a different opinion regarding what is in the child's best interest. 

    The following is a suit that was filed in Virginia before the parents informed the treating physicians that they were declining the treatment protocol to prevent the possibility of the harm effectuated by misguided government.

    Result:  After threats of sanctions, cooler minds prevailed.  The Commonwealth of Virginia realized and agreed that fit parents making informed and difficult medical decisions are in the best position to make those difficult decisions and that those parents should not have the added burden of government intrusion.   The treating physicians after convening an ethics committee opined that respecting fit parents informed and difficult decisions for treatment of their children was appropriate. With all parties and the government's promise not to intrude or to rip the child from the home, the suit was dropped. 

     Infant Doe completed a modified protocol without the drugs that the Doe's declined and remains Leukemia free.  (The right legal decision remains that government should not intrude in the difficult medical decision of fit parents associated with measuring risks/benefits in medical decisions for their children irrespective of the outcome)"

WHERE ARE ALL THESE CHILDHOOD CANCERS COMING FROM, ANYWAY?  Listener emails: 

"One thing troubles me.  What about the out-of-the-blue things that tend to hit kids; like some of the blood cancers?  Any thoughts on this slice of cancer?"  

NEW STUDY - VACCINES CAUSE AUTISM, LEUKEMIA, LYMPHOMAS:   Journal of Public Health and Epimediology.  Nevada Governor 2014, David Lory VanDerBeek

"SEATTLE, Sept. 8, 2014 /Standard Newswire/ – A new study published in the September 2014 volume of the Journal of Public Health and Epidemiology reveals a significant correlation between autism disorder (AD) and MMR, Varicella (chickenpox) and Hepatitis-A vaccines.

Using statistical analysis and data from the US Government, UK, Denmark and Western Australia, scientists at Sound Choice Pharmaceutical Institute (SCPI) found that increases in autistic disorder correspond with the introduction of vaccines using human fetal cell lines and retroviral contaminants.

Even more alarming, Dr Theresa Deisher, lead scientist and SCPI founder noted that, “Not only are the human fetal contaminated vaccines associated with autistic disorder throughout the world, but also with epidemic childhood leukemia and lymphomas.

60 LAB STUDIES NOW CONFIRM CANCER LINK TO A VACCINE YOU PROBABLY HAD AS A CHILD - Joseph Mercola, DO

"For starters, the HPV vaccine Gardasil, which is being vigorously pushed on unsuspecting young girls and women to theoretically guard against cervical cancer still has never been proven to actually prevent cancer. On the contrary, evidence suggests that under certain circumstances the vaccine increases your risk of precancerous lesions by nearly 45 percent, and an ever increasing number of girls are being seriously injured by this unnecessary vaccine.

As of December 13, 2010, 20,915 adverse reactions had been reported in the United States alone, including 89 deaths, 297 miscarriages or stillbirths, and 370 reports of abnormal pap smears post vaccination.

All of this from a vaccine that has only been on the market for four years!

Making matters worse, as of 2009 the US FDA approved Gardasil for use on young boys as well, and the first male death has also been reported. In September of last year, a young boy died just eight days after being vaccinated with Gardasil.

So what’s going on here?

Is it possible that vaccines sold by drugmakers like Merck are causing lethal disease? Judging by history, the answer may be yes."

OH, and... IN THE NEWS this week: